David B. on Esoterism

From The Comics Journal's interview of David B.:

WIVEL: Why is occultism so fascinating to you, compared to other belief systems?

DAVID B: Because it alludes to another dimension, another possibility. That is to say that there are things that are hidden, a hidden dimension. And that's exactly what was going on with my brother's illness. One moment he'd seem normal, and then suddenly there would be a seizure that made him fall to the ground. So by necessity, in order to understand the discrepancy between these two states, which constituted my brother's reality, I tried to find the explanation in something that was within my frame of reference. I found it in occultism, more so than in clinical reality, because anyway, the physicians were incapable of curing him -- so I had to go elsewhere. That's what my parents did too, in taking macrobiotics, tracking down gurus, all that stuff. The reality had to be elsewhere. That's also why, when I was little, I'd invent friends who were fantastical characters. Children often make up imaginary friends who are friendly, such as heroes, but for me they were ghosts and demons, because that was my frame of reference. I needed friends who existed within that context. My brother's illness threw us into an alternate reality, and that was a problem for society around us, with which we had no way of reasoning, because my brother couldn't get any better. I'd accepted the fact that this was our context and we had to live in it, so we were on the side of the demons, on the side of mystery, on the side of night. It was a life choice.

From the point I realized that my brother would never be cured; we had to embrace it, we had to accept it. Because society rejected us -- when we played in the streets with our friends and my brother would have a seizure, what we experienced was instantaneous, total rejection. After a while, my friends' parents would come see my parents and tell them they shouldn't let their son outside and that they ought to put him "somewhere," and so on. We were perforce in our own world, so we were rejected. In some ways, being a kid, I found that much more captivating than reality. It was something good. Later on it was hard, I came to understand that it had cut me off from a lot of things. Anyway, there was pain.

WIVEL: It was a way of surviving.

DAVID B: Yes, it was a way of sectioning off my life, of understanding where I was, and also of breaking open my imagination. Since I was already drawing a lot anyway, esoterism provided an inexhaustible trove of images, a very rich and interesting one -- the alchemic engravings and all that stuff is something that you never get tired of looking at. It's not necessarily that you get attached to the ideas behind them -- it's more the shock of the image, the poetic shock of seeing this object where there's a whole bunch of stuff -- a fish flying in the sky, next to a cube, over an ocean where there's a guy who is drowning. You see? Hey, it's almost a comic-book panel! There's a story to it. When someone explains to you what it means, that's cool too, but at the time I didn't understand a word of it -- it was the poetic shock of the image, the graphic shock that transported me. It was extraordinary! I'd feel little surges of adrenaline when I looked at that, and as a matter of fact, I felt as if I was physically touching the problem that affected our family, the problem that affected my brother. And I'd say, "My brother's in there, within that mystery."

WIVEL: And the intellectual side of all this only came later?

DAVID B: The intellectual side came later, when I grew up. I acquired knowledge to the point where I no longer was only interested in the images, but also in the texts that accompanied them. The explanations. It's also from that point on, the moment you grow up, that the pain manifests itself. In a certain sense you're innocent when you're a child. You find simple solutions, very comforting ones. The pain comes the moment you try to explain and understand things -- that's when the pain turns fierce.

WIVEL: Occultism is a way of explaining the unknown, like religion -- what is the difference between the two?

DAVID B: I am in no sense a believer. I don't believe in anything at all, but there's probably something to it, the area of belief -- that much is certain. We all need to build ourselves a little personal religion or belief. The fascination with occultism springs from that, but to what degree I'm not exactly sure. Anyway, it doesn't matter. I'm not trying to analyze it -- in fact, it's a way of constructing your own "mise en scène." Like religious people with their holidays and religious ceremonies. I needed to mount my own ceremonies and build up my own symbolism -- and it's also there in the graphic work in Epileptic.

WIVEL: And you'll keep on exploring it in Nocturnal Incidents [Les Incidents de la nuit]?

DAVID B: Absolutely, that's really the theme of Nocturnal Incidents -- my love of books and my love of images, my love of paper and all of that.

WIVEL: And also in your albums for the big publishers, which contain all of that, but...

DAVID B: Yes, there's the album I did for Dupuis, Reading the Ruins [La Lecture de ruines], that's exactly right. It concerns a mad scientist. He's been driven crazy by the war, and he's trying to understand what war is. He believes that war is a piece of writing and it must be read -- the ruins are letters and can be read. And that's exactly the work I did through esoterism, assimilating it with what I was thinking in terms of my brother's illness. When my brother would speak or when he'd have a seizure, there was something to read in that. I saw this war and that's why I drew so many battles. To me that represented my brother's seizures -- that's self-evident. When my brother would have a seizure, there was a battle taking place within his body -- two armies confronting each other and throwing him out of balance. That's Reading the Ruins.

1 October 2007, 21:07 |

Comment

Textile Help

Walser on Kleist   |   E.T.A. Hoffman: Master Flea


Search


Mail Waggish
RSS | Atom

MetaxuCafe

100 Most Recent Essays
  • John Williams: Stoner
  • Shchedrin: The Golovlyov Family
  • Donald Philip Verene: Knowledge of Things Actual And Divine
  • Southland Tales
  • Faulkner's Light in August and Coetzee's Disgrace
  • J.M. Coetzee: Diary of a Bad Year
  • Ernst Cassirer on Art Public and Private
  • P.F. Strawson: Freedom and Resentment
  • More on Gene Wolfe
  • Harry Partch: Delusion of the Fury
  • Gene Wolfe: The Book of the New Sun
  • Richard Hughes: A High Wind in Jamaica
  • Sellars on Following a Rule
  • Robert Walser: The Assistant
  • Occurrences at Owl Creek Bridge: Beyond the Zeroes
  • Carol Polsgrove on Ralph Ellison
  • Grondin on Gadamer
  • Occurrences at Owl Creek Bridge
  • Richard Rorty: Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature
  • Richard Rorty, 1931-2007
  • Jerry Fodor on Galen Strawson on Consciousness
  • Gadamer on Hegel and Language
  • Roberto Bolaño: Amulet
  • Hegel and Wittgenstein
  • Roberto Bolaño: The Savage Detectives
  • The Fall and Romanticism
  • Albert O. Hirschman: Exit, Voice, and Loyalty
  • Cesar Aira: An Episode in the Life of a Landscape Painter
  • Hegel's Conservatism (and McGoohan's Too)
  • Vladimir Sorokin: Ice
  • The Basic Conservatism of Hegel
  • Hegel and Stoicism
  • Kafka: Diogenes
  • Choose Your Own Philosophical Adventure #1: Escape from the Dialectic
  • Miklos Jancso: The Lord's Lantern in Budapest
  • Miklos Jancso: God Walks Backwards
  • Miklos Jancso: Winter Wind (Sirokko)
  • Fun with Consciousness
  • Magdalena Tulli: Moving Parts
  • Hugo von Hofmannsthal: An Incident...
  • Joanna Russ: We Who Are About To... [Die]
  • Finnegans Wake: The Book of Lists
  • Ecumenicality
  • David B.: Two Stories
  • What's Missing from Finnegans Wake
  • Laszlo Krasznahorkai: War and War
  • The Fifth Horseman is Fear
  • Christopher Priest: The Affirmation
  • Inquest on Left-Brained Literature
  • More Books on the (Finnegans) Wake
  • Carl Schmitt
  • Shohei Imamura 1926-2006
  • The Books on the (Finnegans) Wake
  • Gnostic Children's Books
  • Finnegans Wake and Little, Big
  • Reflections in/on Finnegans Wake
  • Godard: Masculin-Feminin
  • Dino Buzzati: The Tartar Steppe
  • Ilya Khrzhanovsky: 4 (Chetyre)
  • Stanislaw Lem (1921-2006)
  • Anne Stevenson: In the Museum of Floating Bodies and Flammable Souls
  • Hiroshi Teshigahara: The Face of Another
  • Samuel Beckett: How It Is & Ping
  • Elaine May: A New Leaf
  • Bela Tarr: Satantango [3]
  • J.M. Coetzee: Slow Man
  • Harold Brodkey
  • Bela Tarr: Satantango [2]
  • Bela Tarr: Satantango
  • Gabriel Josipovici: In a Hotel Garden
  • Erich Auerbach: Mimesis 1
  • Samuel Delany: The Motion of Light in Water
  • Yasunari Kawabata: The Sound of the Mountain
  • Keiho Oguri: Sting of Death
  • Aleksandr Sokurov: The Sun
  • Samuel Beckett: Watt
  • A la Fin Du Temps Perdu
  • John Crowley: Great Work of Time
  • David Grossman: See Under: Love
  • Alain Resnais: Night and Fog
  • Albert O. Hirschman: The Passions and the Interests
  • Denis Diderot: Rameau's Nephew
  • Gabriel Josipovici on Grimm and Kleist
  • Shaviro on Schumpeter
  • Thoughts on Genre: Blogs and Practice
  • Thoughts on Genre: Blogs and Improvisation
  • Thoughts on Genre: Blogs and Genre
  • Thomas Bernhard: Extinction
  • Strawson on Consciousness
  • Thoughts on Genre: Hitsville, Dullsville
  • Thoughts on Genre: Exceptional Science Fiction
  • Thoughts on Genre: The Secret of Comedy (circa 1935)
  • J.M. Coetzee: Elizabeth Costello
  • Thoughts on Work
  • Jean Eustache: The Mother and the Whore
  • Brett Bourbon: Finding a Replacement for the Soul, cont.
  • Adolescence
  • Jacques Becker
  • Brett Bourbon: Finding a Replacement for the Soul, cont.
  • Brett Bourbon: Finding a Replacement for the Soul

Work in Progress
  • Waggish Reads Proust
  • The Novel: 206,000 (first draft finished)

Comment
  • nightspore (Sellars on Kant)
  • Mr. Waggish (Sellars on Kant)
  • nightspore (Montaigne: On Democritus and Heraclitus)
  • nightspore (Sellars on Kant)
  • peli grietzer (Sellars on Kant)
  • Mr. Waggish (Iannis Xenakis: Free Stochastic Music By Computer)
  • dan visel (Iannis Xenakis: Free Stochastic Music By Computer)
  • Sherlock Jr. (John Williams: Stoner)
Please Read
  • Cahiers de Corey
  • charlotte street
  • Chekhov's Mistress
  • Complete Review
  • Dispatches from Zembla
  • Eudaemonist
  • Even Unto Thy Shoes
  • The Existence Machine
  • Flowerville
  • Fortunes of the Dialectic
  • Geegaw
  • Gentle Reader
  • Golden Rule Jones
  • Le Colonel Chabert
  • Mumpsimus
  • Nightspore
  • pas au-dela
  • Pseudopodium
  • The Reading Experience
  • ReadySteadyBook
  • scarecrow
  • snarkout
  • Spurious
  • Stochastic Bookmark
  • Tabula Rasa
  • This Public Address
  • This Space
  • Three-Toed Sloth
  • With Hidden Noise
  • wood s lot

Credits
  • Banner by David B
  • Design by geegaw
  • CSS by snarkout
  • CMS by Textpattern

Archives
  • January 2003
  • February 2003
  • March 2003
  • April 2003
  • May 2003
  • June 2003
  • September 2003
  • October 2003
  • November 2003
  • December 2003
  • January 2004
  • February 2004
  • March 2004
  • April 2004
  • June 2004
  • September 2004
  • October 2004
  • November 2004
  • December 2004
  • January 2005
  • February 2005
  • March 2005
  • April 2005
  • May 2005
  • June 2005
  • July 2005
  • August 2005
  • September 2005
  • October 2005
  • November 2005
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008