David Auerbach on literature, tech, film, etc.

Denis Diderot in the TLS

I have an article in the May 6 Times Literary Supplement on Denis Diderot’s life and philosophy. The article is available to subscribers online here: Moi and Lui and a Beehive.

This excerpt covers some of Diderot’s very diverse influence on subsequent thinkers and writers:

Moi and Lui and a Beehive

Denis Diderot OEUVRES PHILOSOPHIQUES Edited by Michel Delon and Barbara de Negroni 1,413pp. Gallimard. €65.

Philipp Blom WICKED COMPANY Freethinkers and friendship in pre-Revolutionary Paris 384pp. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. £25.

In 1805, over twenty years after the death of the French philosophe Denis Diderot, Goethe read a manuscript of Diderot’s then-unpublished dialogue Le Neveu de Rameau. Captivated, he translated it into German. After reading the translation, Hegel cited Diderot along with only half a dozen other modern philosophers in the Phenomenology of Spirit, alongside Descartes and Kant.

Since then, Diderot has wielded diverse influence across the humanities and sciences. Sigmund Freud credited a passage in Le Neveu de Rameau with anticipating the Oedipus complex, while Simone de Beauvoir singled Diderot out as having championed the cause of women. Karl Marx, who like Diderot also wrote a homage to Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy, counted Diderot as his favourite writer. Auguste Comte called him the greatest philosopher of the eighteenth century, and a key forerunner of positivism. The pioneering cultural pluralist Johann Herder drew from Diderot’s observations on cultures and language.

Yet well into the twentieth century, Diderot’s intellectual reputation remained comparatively submerged, even in France. He was the least systematic of writers, and his works were published in the least systematic of ways. His modest publication history during his lifetime paled next to the monumental achievement of editing the Encyclopédie, which occupied him for twenty years. Unlike Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Étienne Bonnot de Condillac, he never published a chef-d’oeuvre. His most sophisticated and radical works were published only posthumously, and their interdisciplinary and non-systematic nature prevented their easy assimilation into the literary or philosophical traditions. His first collected works were not published until 1870. The new Pléiade edition of four volumes, of which the volume under review is the second, is a welcome corrective measure, capturing and contextualizing his unique, eclectic voice and aggressive speculation. Today, Diderot seems more contemporary than his more famous brethren, Voltaire and Rousseau.


  1. Congratulations! I have never been able to get the TLS’s archive to work without an email to somebody, so I’ll wait until my copy arrives in the mail. Very excited about this, though.

  2. Oh, also related to the TLS: I bought a copy of Albert Vigoleis Thelen’s The Island of Second Sight (in the translation of Donald O. White) on the strength of the review there. You know it? Any good?

  3. Congrats, David. As a rude and unlettered non-TLS-subscriber, I haven’t been able to read this…but I will hunt down a copy of the May 6 issue soon and look forward to reading it.

  4. David Auerbach

    10 May 2011 at 14:11

    Thanks Dan. I read the review of the Thelen book and was intrigued as well, but ultimately found myself a little skeptical, for reasons that weren’t entirely clear. Maybe a fear of rococo detail and an obscuring, near-garish surface? So on my mental to-read list it got slotted below Heimito von Doderer’s The Demons, and since I’m nowhere near getting around to *that* one….

    I look forward to your report on it!

  5. My Sun & Moon edition of The Demons is the other fat German novel I have sitting on my shelf waiting to be read. Some day I will have a pressing need for fat German novels.

  6. Yesterday I came across your Diderot post while googling reviews of Blom’s book, and then went to library and photocopied your TLS article. Congratulations on a superb review that will hopefully increase the renown of a thinker who deserves to be much better known and hopefully will be, thanks to your sympathetic and incisive essay. May it herald a Diderot revival!

  7. Or a library photocopier revival. (I hope to make time for one myself today.)

Leave a Reply

© 2024 Waggish

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑