from Hans-Johann Glock’s What is Analytic Philosophy?
Update:Courtesy of j, this older diagram of Carnap on the Vienna Circle:
-
Work in Progress
- Waggish Reads Proust
- The Novel: 206,000 (first draft finished)
- The Novel, revised: 182,000 and done for now
-
Comments
- Dave Tallman on Gene Wolfe Challenge Won!
- graywyvern on My Secret Science Fiction Past
- James Wynn on Gene Wolfe Challenge Won!
- justbookclc on J.M. Coetzee: Summertime
- ben w on Huw Price on Robert Brandom
-
Please Read
- A Journey Round My Skull
- Blind Pony Books
- Cahiers de Corey
- Chekhov’s Mistress
- Complete Review
- Dispatches from Zembla
- Eudaemonist
- Flowerville
- Fortunes of the Dialectic
- Geegaw
- Gentle Reader
- Georgy Riecke
- Golden Rule Jones
- Le Colonel Chabert
- Letters from a Librarian
- Mumpsimus
- Nightspore
- Pseudopodium
- ReadySteadyBook
- snarkout
- Spurious
- Stochastic Bookmark
- Tabula Rasa
- The Existence Machine
- The Reading Experience
- This Public Address
- This Space
- Three-Toed Sloth
- Times Flow Stemmed
- Vinyl is Heavy
- With Hidden Noise
- wood s lot
-
Archives
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- June 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
-
Credits
8 Comments
I’m guessing Glock really liked the Vienna Circle?
Huh. The chart shows up on Google Reader, but not, now that I arrive here, in this post itself (on Firefox at least). What happened?
Oops! Thanks Dave, I’ve fixed it now.
Jake: Glock has a sympathy for the Vienna Circle over Ryle or Quine, but he’s still not happy about their total rejection of metaphysics and philosophical indifference to politics. (Though he points out that most of the Vienna Circle had very strong politics indeed, which just weren’t reflected in their philosophy, aside from the unstated assumption that reason and the abandonment of metaphysics/religion/superstition will lead to a rational, liberal, just society.)
are those supposed to be things had, or pursued, or professed to be had or pursued?
the resemblance makes me think this chart was modeled after carnap’s own:
http://www.pitt.edu/~philosop/images/doc4-full.jpg
That’s a nice one, I’ve never seen it before. Even more interesting is how every view is divided into before/during/after Tractatus.
These are things had, at least according to Glock. As can be seen, a number of them are debatable… (Gotta love the “argument” and “clarity” items though.)
I’d at least put a paren around the idea that TLP rejects science, and a paren around the idea that WVQ doesn’t reject metaphysics. Cool chart though.
I see Schlick is claiming that he knew die Definition ist eine Festsetzung even before the Tractatus. Poser.
i still find it remarkable how a profession full of people who have to spend part of their time inducting students into their tradition can say with a straight face that their canonical texts are ‘clear’.